Your Mission Moves Fast. Manufacturo Keeps It Safe.

Icon Innovation

Built for aerospace complexity

Safeguards that match the rigor of space hardware. 

Icon Compliance

Compliance in the workflow

AS9100- and ITAR-compliant controls built into daily actions. 

Icon Centralized

Open, connected platform

Every process linked through one digital thread.

Trusted by Leading Space Companies

Manufacturo is trusted by pioneering space companies who demand speed, compliance, and scale — and can’t afford broken digital threads. 

Space Pain Points by the Numbers

Icon Innovation

2,695

Satellites launched in 2024. Record throughput magnifies the cost of any traceability gap, so one bad part can cascade across hundreds of builds.

BryceTech, “2024 in Review: Global Space Activity,” 2025.

Icon Satellite

11,539

Satellites operating by year-end 2024. More assets to track equals tighter pedigree requirements and configuration control.

UCS Satellite Database, January 2025 update.

Icon Improvments

17%

Satellite manufacturing revenue grew in 2024. Production ramps expose fragmented build histories and siloed data.

Satellite Industry Association, “State of the Satellite Industry Report 2025.”

Icon Notification

23%

Aerospace suppliers cite digital thread adoption as a top tech obstacle. Most stacks aren’t ready for end-to-end traceability.

Aerospace Industries Association, “2024 Aerospace Supply Chain Health Check.”

Everyday Pain Points Beyond the Numbers

The numbers tell only part of the story. For New Space teams, real pain surfaces every day on the shop floor and in the test bay.

Designs evolve daily, builds iterate, compliance is always top of mind, and scaling from 20 to 200 people exposes productivity-killing weakness in disconnected tools. 

Icon Industry

Fragmented Systems

CAD, PLM, ERP, MES, spreadsheets, and Jira/Excel band-aids that break the digital thread. 

  • On-the-ground view: A systems engineer spends hours chasing down payload specs scattered across spreadsheets, PLM exports, and supplier PDFs. 
  • Example: A major NASA satellite assembly program required additional in-house engineering oversight when inconsistent contractor deliverables across multiple systems created gaps, contributing to schedule slips. 
Icon Software

Engineering Overhead

Significant engineering hours are drained reconciling disconnected data – cross-checking spreadsheets, hunting down missing pedigrees, and stitching together records instead of advancing designs. 

  • On-the-ground view: A design engineer spends weeks re-assembling telemetry pedigree when a satellite component’s supplier record is incomplete. 
  • Example: In government satellite programs, engineers have had to spend valuable time reconciling fragmented system integration and mismatched records, delaying progress on mission-critical equipment. 
Icon Delay

Delays

Timelines slip when data and processes are trapped in silos – engineering waits on quality, quality waits on suppliers, and production stalls in between. 

  • On-the-ground view: A program manager watches a launch date slide because ground systems wait on verification records that suppliers haven’t delivered. 
  • Example: Satellite launches have been postponed for months when ground system readiness, supplier documentation, or verification steps were not aligned across teams. 
Icon Compliance

Compliance risk

Manual workflows and editable histories create gaps that slip past reviews, leading to quality escapes, failed audits, and potential grounding of entire programs. 

  • On-the-ground view: A quality lead halts a satellite shipment until 8130-3 tags and CMM reports can be matched to the as-built record. 
  • Example: Space programs have faced higher cost and schedule risk when critical verification and testing deliverables from contractors were missing or delayed, exposing compliance gaps. 

“I have yet to find an adequate build record” - Frustrated 25-year Industry Veteran 

Marketed as Solutions. Built Without Safeguards.

Other manufacturing platforms market themselves as solutions to these problems while offering "flexibility."

But here's the truth: flexibility without structure isn't freedom; it's fragility and hidden risk.

In under-governed systems, editable pedigrees (records that distinguish flight-ready parts from development builds and track their lineage), "completion" without completeness, and hashtag-driven data create quality escapes, audit gaps, and launch delays. Without proper guardrails, checks and balances, and process control, even well-intentioned teams can slip into costly errors.

Pedigree Failure

Diagram Pedigree Failure

Completion Control Failure

Diagram Completion Control Failure

Marked Complete

Diagram Hashtag or Data Failure

Other Structural Gaps That Create Risk

1

No BOM-to-process linkage

Without direct linkage, planning and compliance breakdown: incomplete BOMs, incomplete process plans, and incomplete validation against customer requirements can allow the wrong part at the wrong step.

2

Outdated or conflicting plans

Weak redlining and change management let multiple versions of instructions stay active. Teams risk executing outdated or in-work routings that haven’t been approved, introducing hidden quality and structural risks. 

3

Ad hoc installs allowed

When non-kitted parts can be installed, uninspected or development-grade parts may be swapped in for flight parts. This bypasses required inspection rigor and creates unacceptable risk to vehicle integrity. 

4

Mixed trace states

Disconnected data allows quantity-zero runs, null or missing lots/serials, and mismatches across part, run, and inventory records. These gaps undermine traceability and jeopardize audit readiness. 

Structure That Scales. Safeguards That Stick.

For New Space, true freedom comes from balance: flexibility to innovate, structure to stay safe, and the strength to scale.

Competitor “solutions” and Excel patchworks fail because they erase or lack history, fragment and cut the digital thread, and collapse under the massive weight of compliance.

The very failures of competitor platforms and disconnected systems are where Manufacturo is strongest. 

Pain Point

Manufacturo Solution

Editable Pedigree
• Flight vs dev set with no safeguards
• Pedigree lives on part master, not enforced in transactions
Immutable Traceability
• Every status change is locked and auditable
• Pedigree carried in transactional lineage with end-to-end visibility
Completion Control Failure
• Work orders can close with required parts missing
• Ad hoc installs allow non-kitted parts
Enforced Completeness
• Completeness checks block closure until all required parts are installed
• Approved kits only, with component-to-operation linkage and role-based controls
Data Chaos
• Hashtag-driven attributes (#flight, #flt, #FlightPart)
• Inconsistent tagging breaks traceability and queries
Structured Digital Thread
• Structured fields and controlled vocabularies for critical attributes
• BOMs, repairs, and tests linked in one record; standardized queries stay intact
Scaling Chaos
• Multiple active plans increase execution risk
• Deep nested locations without governance create inconsistency
• Teams stitch together JIRA boards and spreadsheets to keep moving
Scales With You
• Single source of truth routing with effective dating and usage control
• Governed location hierarchy with guardrails as teams and sites grow
• Built for aerospace complexity. Not another JIRA clone
Compliance Risk
• Manual workarounds and editable histories create escapes
• Fragmented tools hide what happened and when
Compliance in Workflow
• AS9100 and ITAR-aligned controls embedded in daily actions with audit trails
• Audit-ready evidence generated automatically without slowing engineers
IT Landscape
• Siloed systems with costly integration
• Large and expensive integrations
• Costly upgrades and deployments
• Vendor lock-in limits data ownership and flexibility
Modern IT Platform
• API-first platform with open standards, eliminating brittle custom code
• Lightweight, modular connections deployed quickly and scaled as needed
• Cloud-native rollouts with continuous, no-downtime updates
• Open data access and parametric rules that keep customers in control
Zane

"Freedom without structure isn't innovation—it's expensive guesswork. Real speed is the freedom to build the right part, the right way with total confidence. ” - Zane Shewalter

A Depth of Functionality That Delivers

We built the platform we always wanted on the floor: one connected system that fits into your infrastructure, keeps the thread unbroken, and scales without workarounds.

It works for you, not you for it. 

Icon Centralized

One Connected System

Work instructions, integrated quality, tooling, part requests and inventory, and equipment all in one platform. 

Icon Software

Molds to Your IT Infrastructure

Adapts to your ecosystem instead of forcing bolt-ons or patches.

Icon AI

Built for Space Complexity

Designed for teams building the most regulated, compliant, and complex hardware in the world. 

Icon Sequence

Vertical Integration Without the Breaks

Supplier onboarding, qualification, and risk tracking built in that is integrated across inventory, POs, and production.

Icon Broken Chain

No Broken Threads

Immutable digital records ensure the catalyst of risk — a broken thread — never enters your process. 

Trusted by Leading Space Innovators

Manufacturo is trusted by pioneering space companies who demand speed, compliance, and scale — and can’t afford broken digital threads. 

One Unified Platform

Manufacturo is more than a suite of apps; it’s the operating backbone for New Space teams.

From purchase orders and supply chain management to inventory operations, production workflows, quality processes, and forecasting, every step connects through a single digital thread.

The result: complete traceability, built-in compliance, and a platform that scales with you from prototype to orbit.